Guardrails need safety improvements


In Connecticut and the United States, car accidents are often attributed to another reckless or negligent driver. Defective infrastructure or safety devices can also contribute to these injuries.

A joint task force from the Federal Highway Administration and the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials recently evaluated car crash data indicating that extruding w-beam guardrail end terminals made by several manufacturers suffered performance limitations in different types of crash and installation situations. These devices are comprised of the shield-type device at the front end of a guardrail strip.

From 2009 until 2013, an average of 63 traffic fatalities in the United States involved crashes with all types of guardrail terminals. Collison with a guard rail end comprised 0.2 percent of highway fatalities in this country in 2013.

The Task Force studied 1,231 collisions involving guardrails from numerous sources with emphasis on data concerning the ET-Plus 4-inch terminal. Its study focused on accidents involving severe injuries, fatalities, occupant compartment penetration or deformation, rollovers or unusual or extreme collisions. Because these terminals are tested in laboratory settings, crash data was also evaluated to conclude how the devices performed in actual conditions.

The Task Force found that the extruding w-beam guardrail terminals which met National Cooperative Highway Research Committee Report 350 test standards displayed performance limitations under certain types of collisions and installation conditions. These collisions included side impacts, head-on impacts that took place near the corner of the vehicle and head-on shallow and high-energy impacts. Failure to conform to guidelines governing installation, maintenance or repair and grading guardrail placement also lowered guardrail performance.

The Task Force recommended using the new generation of guardrail terminals, implementing a timeline for all new installations that meet specified test criteria, performing evaluations of guardrail terminals that were installed, expanding guardrail crash documentation and researching side and corner impacts with the terminals. Furthermore, no further testing should be performed of existing w-beam guardrail terminals under NCHRP 350 and the proper placement and installation of roadside safety hardware should be promoted in addition to correct maintenance.

Determining the respective liability of a negligent driver and infrastructure often requires legal assistance. Legal representation can help assure that a car victim can obtain evidence for seeking compensation in a lawsuit

Source: Federal Highway Administration, "FHWA and AASHTO release findings on guardrail terminal crash analysis," accessed Sept. 22, 2015

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
Email Us For A Response
    • Martindale-Hubbell Peer Rated for Ethical Standards and Legal Ability
    • 2018 Avvo Client Choice Award
    • Avvo Rated Best Attorney
    • Expertise 2020
    • National Trial Lawyers Top 100 Trial Lawyers
    • Lawyers Of Distinction 2019
    • 2020 10 Best Connecticut Attorney in Client Satisfaction
    • 10 Best 2015 - Client Satisfaction - American Institute of Personal Injury Attorneys (TM)
    • 2015 Top 10 Best Connecticut Law Firms
    • 10 Best 2015 - Client Satisfaction - 10 Best Law Firms - American Institute of Personal Injury Attorneys (TM)
    • 15 Years | Marquis Who's Who | Marquis Who's Who in American Law | Marquis Who's Who in America | Marquis Who's Who In the World | Marquis Who's Who In the Finance and Industry
    • Avvo - Rate your Lawyer. Get Free Legal Advice

*AV Preeminent and BV Distinguished are certification marks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc., used in accordance with the Martindale-Hubbell certification procedures, standards and policies. Martindale-Hubbell is the facilitator of a peer review rating process. Ratings reflect the confidential opinions of members of the Bar and the judiciary. Martindale-Hubbell ratings fall into two categories - legal ability and general ethical standards.

*AV Preeminent and BV Distinguished are certification marks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc., used in accordance with the Martindale-Hubbell certification procedures, standards and policies. Martindale-Hubbell is the facilitator of a peer review rating process. Ratings reflect the confidential opinions of members of the Bar and the judiciary. Martindale-Hubbell ratings fall into two categories - legal ability and general ethical standards.

Contact The Law Offices Of James L. O'Rourke Today

If you have been injured in an accident, our experienced personal injury attorneys will help you pursue the full compensation you deserve. To schedule a free consultation, contact us online or call 203-864-4427. We are ready to take your call 24/7. Evening and weekend appointments are available upon request, as are home or hospital room visits. Spanish translation services are available.

Office ${site.data.firmName}${SEMFirmNameAlt}

Stratford Office
1825 Barnum Avenue, Suite 201
Stratford, CT 06614

Toll Free: 800-658-1245
Phone: 203-864-4427
Fax: 203-377-2770
Stratford Law Office Map

Shelton Office
221 Nells Rock Road
Shelton, CT 06484

Toll Free: 800-658-1245
Phone: 203-864-4427
Fax: 203-377-2770
Shelton Law Office Map